Chelsea Houska & Cole DeBoer Will Head to Court Over $4 Million Lawsuit Involving Their Former Management Company; ‘Down Home Fab’ Stars Refuse to Settle

Chelsea and Cole, when asked if they want to seek a settlement…

Former Teen Mom 2 star Chelsea Houska is gearing up for a visit to a Teen Mom franchise hotspot: the courthouse. 

As The Ashley previously told you, Chelsea and husband Cole DeBoer were sued by their former consulting company “Envy” in 2020 for allegedly withholding money made from social media promotions. The Down Home Fab couple went on to countersue Envy a month later, denying the consulting company’s claims that they purposely tried to get brands to pay them personally to avoid giving Envy their contracted cut of the revenue.

“This ain’t your cash, Envy!”

In a letter to the judge obtained by The Sun, both parties confirmed this week that they have “completed discovery”– (which essentially means both sides have gathered witness testimony, evidence and other information to be used at the trial)– and neither side is ready to settle.

“The parties do not seek a settlement conference at this time,” the documents state, according to The Sun. 

(Multiple requests from both parties to extend the discovery deadline have been granted by the judge since 2020, including a 2021 request from Chelsea to postpone her deposition due to her pregnancy with fourth child, Walker.) 

While Envy was initially seeking $3 million from the ‘Down Home Fab’ duo, Envy has since filed an Amended Complaint to the 2020 lawsuit, adding Chelsea and Cole’s companies Down Home DeBoer, Aubree Says, Dakota Ln LLC and DeBoer Holding Company as defendants to the case, and the consulting company is now suing for $4 million. 

That face you make when someone thinks they’re going to get $4 million from you…

The consulting company claims Chelsea entered into a contract with them in 2015, agreeing to “only enter licensing agreements for the Property through Envy, to allow Envy to exclusively negotiate such agreements, to collect all resulting revenue, and to pay Envy 35 [percent] of all fees or royalties earned … for domestic deals and 40 [percent] of all fees or royalties for foreign [deals].”

Meanwhile, Cole allegedly signed on to work with the company in 2016. 

In court documents, Envy claimed the couple “breached their contracts by directing certain Brands to directly pay Chelsea, Cole, one of the other Shared Clients, and/or other persons or entities to avoid paying Envy Licensing Fees.” In addition to concealing entities, Envy has accused Chelsea and Cole (and the “Shared Clients”) of earning and “continuing to earn, millions of dollars as a result of Envy’s efforts.” 

“…no thanks to you, Envy.”

Chelsea and Cole have denied many of the claims made by Envy in the lawsuit, including that she and Cole made “millions of dollars” from deals the consulting company got them. 

In the couple’s 2020 counterclaim, they also alleged that Envy actually withheld nearly $155,000 from them– a claim that Envy has denied.  

A pre-motion conference has been set for April 11 in New York City. It is unknown if Chelsea and Cole will have to attend. 

RELATED STORY: Chelsea Houska Reveals Why Her Daughter Aubree Isn’t Allowed to Have Facial Piercings or Instagram; Says Aubree Wants to Be More Involved with ‘Down Home Fab’ Season 2

(Photos: MTV; HGTV) 

8 Responses

  1. If you do shady things it eventually comes to light, daddy can’t get her out of this one. If this is allegedly true, of course Chelsea DeboBoer would try cover it up.

    1. Boom, you couldn’t have said it better. Thank you, cant use her winey voice to get out if this one.

  2. It seems like they didn’t realize how big a chunk of change 30%-40% is plus taxes and everything else that comes out of that payday. And tried to go behind the management company back. Hate to say it but they will probably lose.

  3. This lawsuit looks a bit like you fire your contractor and they want 40% of all the work you did yourself and hired others for cause they did such a bad job.

    However, they signed a deal that only this contractor could do work on their house.
    Apparently, Chelsea didn’t learn enough from signing a lot of her freedom and rights away to MTV for years.
    I can’t imagine she could not get better management for less.
    They probably made lots of promises. Let’s hope they put those on paper so the DeBoer’s rightfully terminated the contract, legally.

  4. $4 million vs $155k? The math is not mathing.

    And that contract is crazy, why would Chelsea sign that. 35-40% to the management company??? That’s so nuts! Even if they brought the booking.

    Even LA is not so cut throat, managers usually do 10-25% for a new artist, and she had a pre-existing brand.

    I hope to learn more as the case goes to the court. Thanks Ashley.

    1. The most important thing is whether they were legally in their right to terminate their contract with Envy.

      I can’t imagine people are not allowed to fire their managers.
      On the other side, Envy either has a lot of nerve or they have a point about the way they terminated it.
      Option 3: they knew they were going to get sued for withholding money from the DeBoers. You can hire a lot of lawyer for 150K with a huge counterclaim and save face when the judge says there is not enough proof you stole from clients and sucked.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share the Post:

Related Posts